Washington’s statute is short and deliberately flexible. The court may order maintenance for either spouse in such amounts and for such periods of time as it deems just, without regard to misconduct, after considering the financial resources of the spouse seeking it, the time needed to acquire education or training for appropriate employment, the standard of living during the marriage, the length of the marriage, the age and physical and emotional condition and financial obligations of the spouse seeking maintenance, and the ability of the other spouse to pay while meeting their own needs. Washington’s Supreme Court reaffirmed in 2024 that the list of factors is not exclusive and that trial courts have broad discretion.
There is no formula, no table and no county-wide schedule. What there is, after decades of cases, is a set of informal benchmarks that Eastside attorneys and judges use as starting points. This estimator shows those benchmarks as ranges so you can plan around a realistic outcome rather than a single number nobody can promise.
